MAGA against chicken vaccines. Apparently.
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/chicken- ... -bird-flu/
Vaccine ****ery
- Rich Scopie
- Catbabel
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:21 pm
Re: Vaccine ****ery
It first was a rumour dismissed as a lie, but then came the evidence none could deny:
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
- Rich Scopie
- Catbabel
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:21 pm
Re: Vaccine ****ery
bl..dy hell - this is bad.
Florida aims to ban vaccine mandates for schoolchildren
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg0e485wwwo
Florida aims to ban vaccine mandates for schoolchildren
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg0e485wwwo
It first was a rumour dismissed as a lie, but then came the evidence none could deny:
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
Re: Vaccine ****ery
Stupid is as stupid does.
I guess the best we can say about this is that it helps weed out the stupid by natural selection.
I guess the best we can say about this is that it helps weed out the stupid by natural selection.
You can't polish a turd...
unless its Lion or Osterich poo... http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbus ... -turd.html
unless its Lion or Osterich poo... http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbus ... -turd.html
Re: Vaccine ****ery
This follows hot on the heels of them banning chemtrails, and then the voters who pushed for that being pissed off that they still see contrails.Rich Scopie wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 8:37 am bl..dy hell - this is bad.
Florida aims to ban vaccine mandates for schoolchildren
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg0e485wwwo
- Rich Scopie
- Catbabel
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:21 pm
Re: Vaccine ****ery
Messiah on a velocipede...dyqik wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 11:32 amThis follows hot on the heels of them banning chemtrails, and then the voters who pushed for that being pissed off that they still see contrails.Rich Scopie wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 8:37 am bl..dy hell - this is bad.
Florida aims to ban vaccine mandates for schoolchildren
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg0e485wwwo
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... egislation
It first was a rumour dismissed as a lie, but then came the evidence none could deny:
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
Re: Vaccine ****ery
The irony being that it is possible to ban mostly eliminate chemtrails/contrails by rerouting aircraft to avoid regions of the atmosphere that would generate persistent contrails. This is likely to have a positive impact on climate change, but the contrail haters would probably hate that there would be an incidental benefit.Rich Scopie wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 3:38 pmMessiah on a velocipede...dyqik wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 11:32 am This follows hot on the heels of them banning chemtrails, and then the voters who pushed for that being pissed off that they still see contrails.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... egislation
Yes, there's a likely CO2 burden of a few percentage points, but removing the persistent contrails would potentially allow far greater cooling of the atmosphere at night*, and this could reduce the warming effects of air travel by (reportedly) over 50%.
https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/ ... n-spc-intl
* during the post 9/11 lockdown of US Airspace, the diurnal temperature variation over the country was significantly increased** https://www.jstor.org/stable/24868704 potentially due to the lack of contrails generated by air traffic
** doubters may suggest it was due to 'unusually clear weather' following 9/11, but maybe that was another side effect.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!