Astronomy and Space

Get your science fix here: research, quackery, activism and all the rest
Post Reply
User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 8514
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by dyqik »

Gfamily wrote: Mon Feb 23, 2026 12:27 am First day since June 2022 when there are no visible sunspots.

1771759438128_1.jpg
That's because we've been in blizzard conditions all day...
User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 8514
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by dyqik »

Our Minor Planet Center has announced the discovery of four more moons of Jupiter, bringing the total to 101.
IvanV
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3690
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 11:12 am

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by IvanV »

dyqik wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 11:15 pm Our Minor Planet Center has announced the discovery of four more moons of Jupiter, bringing the total to 101.
Many of them are very small. About half them are about 1km or 2km across. We have so far found rather more that are approx 2km than are approx 1km. But statistically there should be rather more in the 1km size range. And then many, many more in the hundreds of metres size range. And boulders and rocks and...

I read there is no established minimum size for a moon. So where does it end? We finally realised it was silly to call Pluto a planet. Is it silly to have potentially millions of moons of Jupiter? Should we reserve the word moon for sufficiently significant objects? Where can we draw the line? Or doesn't it matter?
User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 8514
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by dyqik »

High
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Brightonian
After Pie
Posts: 1657
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:16 pm
Location: France and Ireland, sometimes UK

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by Brightonian »

dyqik wrote: Sat Mar 28, 2026 8:20 pmHigh
Atacama Desert? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atacama_L ... eter_Array
User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 8514
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by dyqik »

Brightonian wrote: Sat Mar 28, 2026 8:33 pm
dyqik wrote: Sat Mar 28, 2026 8:20 pmHigh
Atacama Desert? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atacama_L ... eter_Array
Yes
IvanV
Stummy Beige
Posts: 3690
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 11:12 am

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by IvanV »

Brightonian wrote: Sat Mar 28, 2026 8:33 pm
dyqik wrote: Sat Mar 28, 2026 8:20 pmHigh
Atacama Desert? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atacama_L ... eter_Array
Atacama, but Puna de Atacama, rather than Desierto de Atacama. The dry puna is a distinctive eco-region.
User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 8514
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by dyqik »

Higher

5,400m on Cerro Toco, looking down on ALMA and APEX and up at CCAT and TAOS.

(ALMA make you use oxygen above 3000m. I'm fine at 5,400m without it)
PXL_20260329_140356147_copy_1600x1200.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 6013
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by Gfamily »

To go with the scheduled launch of Artemis II this evening, the BBC World Service is producing a 3rd series of Podcasts under their '13 Minutes to the Moon' banner. Led by Tim Peake (ESA Astronaut) and Maggie Aderin (Space Scientist and Sky at Night Presenter), a new episode will drop every day of the mission.
If it's anywhere near the quality of their first two series (on the Apollo 11 landing, and on the Space Shuttle), it should be excellent.
Listen on BBC Sounds, or download from your usual podcast store or here
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
geejaytee
Clardic Fug
Posts: 207
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:32 pm
Location: Norf Landan, mate

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by geejaytee »

Gfamily wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2026 12:14 pm To go with the scheduled launch of Artemis II this evening, the BBC World Service is producing a 3rd series of Podcasts under their '13 Minutes to the Moon' banner. Led by Tim Peake (ESA Astronaut) and Maggie Aderin (Space Scientist and Sky at Night Presenter), a new episode will drop every day of the mission.
If it's anywhere near the quality of their first two series (on the Apollo 11 landing, and on the Space Shuttle), it should be excellent.
Listen on BBC Sounds, or download from your usual podcast store or here
They've done three series - they've done Apollos 11 and 13, and the Space Shuttle. There was a bit of delay to some episodes of the Apollo 13 series in March-April 2020 as Kevin Fong had to go back to his day job for obvious reasons.
User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 6013
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Astronomy and Space

Post by Gfamily »

geejaytee wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2026 1:43 pm
Gfamily wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2026 12:14 pm To go with the scheduled launch of Artemis II this evening, the BBC World Service is producing a 3rd series of Podcasts under their '13 Minutes to the Moon' banner. Led by Tim Peake (ESA Astronaut) and Maggie Aderin (Space Scientist and Sky at Night Presenter), a new episode will drop every day of the mission.
If it's anywhere near the quality of their first two series (on the Apollo 11 landing, and on the Space Shuttle), it should be excellent.
Listen on BBC Sounds, or download from your usual podcast store or here
They've done three series - they've done Apollos 11 and 13, and the Space Shuttle. There was a bit of delay to some episodes of the Apollo 13 series in March-April 2020 as Kevin Fong had to go back to his day job for obvious reasons.
Of course; my mistake.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Post Reply