Vaccine ****ery

Discussions about serious topics, for serious people
Post Reply
User avatar
Rich Scopie
Catbabel
Posts: 676
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:21 pm

Re: Vaccine ****ery

Post by Rich Scopie »

MAGA against chicken vaccines. Apparently.

https://www.dailydot.com/debug/chicken- ... -bird-flu/
It first was a rumour dismissed as a lie, but then came the evidence none could deny:
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
User avatar
Rich Scopie
Catbabel
Posts: 676
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:21 pm

Re: Vaccine ****ery

Post by Rich Scopie »

bl..dy hell - this is bad.

Florida aims to ban vaccine mandates for schoolchildren

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg0e485wwwo
It first was a rumour dismissed as a lie, but then came the evidence none could deny:
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
User avatar
TopBadger
Catbabel
Posts: 976
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:33 pm
Location: Halfway up

Re: Vaccine ****ery

Post by TopBadger »

Stupid is as stupid does.

I guess the best we can say about this is that it helps weed out the stupid by natural selection.
You can't polish a turd...
unless its Lion or Osterich poo... http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbus ... -turd.html
User avatar
dyqik
Princess POW
Posts: 8407
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 4:19 pm
Location: Masshole
Contact:

Re: Vaccine ****ery

Post by dyqik »

Rich Scopie wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 8:37 am bl..dy hell - this is bad.

Florida aims to ban vaccine mandates for schoolchildren

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg0e485wwwo
This follows hot on the heels of them banning chemtrails, and then the voters who pushed for that being pissed off that they still see contrails.
User avatar
Rich Scopie
Catbabel
Posts: 676
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:21 pm

Re: Vaccine ****ery

Post by Rich Scopie »

dyqik wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 11:32 am
Rich Scopie wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 8:37 am bl..dy hell - this is bad.

Florida aims to ban vaccine mandates for schoolchildren

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg0e485wwwo
This follows hot on the heels of them banning chemtrails, and then the voters who pushed for that being pissed off that they still see contrails.
Messiah on a velocipede...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... egislation
It first was a rumour dismissed as a lie, but then came the evidence none could deny:
a double page spread in the Sunday Express — the Russians are running the DHSS!
User avatar
Gfamily
Light of Blast
Posts: 5865
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Vaccine ****ery

Post by Gfamily »

Rich Scopie wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 3:38 pm
dyqik wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 11:32 am This follows hot on the heels of them banning chemtrails, and then the voters who pushed for that being pissed off that they still see contrails.
Messiah on a velocipede...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... egislation
The irony being that it is possible to ban mostly eliminate chemtrails/contrails by rerouting aircraft to avoid regions of the atmosphere that would generate persistent contrails. This is likely to have a positive impact on climate change, but the contrail haters would probably hate that there would be an incidental benefit.

Yes, there's a likely CO2 burden of a few percentage points, but removing the persistent contrails would potentially allow far greater cooling of the atmosphere at night*, and this could reduce the warming effects of air travel by (reportedly) over 50%.
https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/ ... n-spc-intl

* during the post 9/11 lockdown of US Airspace, the diurnal temperature variation over the country was significantly increased** https://www.jstor.org/stable/24868704 potentially due to the lack of contrails generated by air traffic

** doubters may suggest it was due to 'unusually clear weather' following 9/11, but maybe that was another side effect.
My avatar was a scientific result that was later found to be 'mistaken' - I rarely claim to be 100% correct
ETA 5/8/20: I've been advised that the result was correct, it was the initial interpretation that needed to be withdrawn
Meta? I'd say so!
Post Reply